FLS 

2015 

030153 


i-'Mr 


t ur.tuii 


r.'. .1 : 


rr.lir-ltla 

• l . s l I it 


* , 




• T; *< i 

, w tew- 


!». . ;*<. • \ i X;»M /»•'.* * rfic^-ri« » *Ut 

; ;■}'»! ;■ '; | Hi j | i; lj 


mnw 


t. ,t 


/If 


• lit 


, iv : jistnutl #•«»IHtifc!'7 fJrrrClfsll 

lift;.;*:j ! fflf • ®?k ; H if mnM' 1 ' ; 

, Mjij ,fji, ; 

! . • » r fi.ii) ,!•» »!{ <•*, . 

• i * • i. i* f ,1 .) !•’ i kM.-f. '»* Ilj • 3*71 .-s.- rfl 1 « iilr' 


[fSJGi ,'i 1 ftfij} 1 iIH 1 

it} Ml {:• i]/ i). ■?}•'} . .•*,< •>(■(}• 'Vi*' .•rL:h\,V 

i; 

!'v~. 1 . 


S c.v.v 






\i > ,rihr,rA 

J m<w 

terra 


til w )r- r 

*;§ 


* i f * 4' * * * k«» •. t 1 I).. r • ; '/l* • • | 1 . i i . 4: * 

i 

• . 

* •)••/* M/sti'* 1 #' *' i'll; ; 4 »Sf (!* -Jw .f «/j ikl'i" 

• • *: • > f’.; 

S':;*'..»»![ J ; 


hi ■ tu 'u'i'.O f ‘; : .i . , i t^» . * »'•/’ */' 1 . !(,i 

'‘b : jH/l j*; m p : '! i hjiihrf{I 4 

• If r i: ' * < ii 'I * <’ ■ t, ilrjt'f 'Mi >/*{• 

Sfiliko;,; <• tf 

jii, /'••••*.».' /»«,•:« V’-M J if fW : <£ 

• ,• », .: {(j i: ri Mmin}• -.h 

■ irt!!'.-;: -.: - 


rMf « • U 


ir.r.nw 




I.' r, V y r /». 
r 

t.l '..(liA/ • 

(' W ^ Ml 




M-ltunnK 


•' • Wt,‘ *'i' 

{illtu’in}! it lf lw 


>n» ; ’a'M 

cfllj:}’I; ft}88fi. 8if}»: 
• a; 115• fir! iv j IIIJ *7i 1 ■} Id i v fl ^* 1 > | {»* • '• iy 1 




4BRARY OF CONGRESS 




:ivm, i|| I; 

[, | i\, i; t ; ; Jrwf* hiM* •. 

vM r ;v- iltiil! !; «•» , 1 




□ □□0173 c ]4S]j 


•I HU • 

i } ® 

. • 

) sift. 

he..: 1 Mr*4)w;.r< 

•.fit Vfiii' , »;.*?■• r t ., nil {-iv 1 iij 

■ ! i •!* •' •'»'•!{•« wjjf} 'ii 




ii v,* n 


*h 













































































































































































































































































































































































































































































<: a 0 * 





01 


t,4 



'V . i HUB 'o. ♦.-.»♦ ,4 <* -- 

O , •■'•« *o, <A r «»"•» ^>ft 

^ J ./y&%-> f o .re* • _ *■ «p 


^ * • # o ° .0 

V *• 

* <$P ^ * 

vnV • 


* • i 


• a v -^. : 

* ♦* % *. 




/ * 

_ '%!» 
e’*°> V V v 

’v/\ ° 

*#> ,o* v 

• *o« '*"* 

* <3 O * 'E5@3 UWu * 

y % *.tt* .o- v * 

: Jfe: V ,'tifr. ;‘ 

• y-v a . 

v vi 28 B/y ^.v <*s ° 


> 


* a <* ,o* v * 

-jA y% qV ,u % 

.if* . * r, s^jrT*?* o 


o • J. 


o V x 

4- 0v ^. 




\a v'-25?! 

,-J^ • VL* », *ft O'" . • l, *» ^O .P oO”** *<S> 

\N * ys\S\W. r, 0 farStfTp** ° v 


’ ^°\ . 
y ^ ‘*'rr,.*^ 1 

r . ’ •» 

♦> 


*. ^ o* ." 


4°+ 




^ y 0 

* W3i^v- * ? ^ 

* f^|f?SSy0 o 3v° V\ 

O *>«^.' 0 * tft • 

% * • * • y 

• ^\r> <$>* *y|f/h! 0 * 

: :^a^: W • 







L> 





l-VTI 







<*>- r b -. T ^. 0 

V c\ **•<>-> O •• *• % ^b A 4 r^ , 

^ •VSIBfcf. V .v^/u% ^ aV ^ 


V j£ 


v><b 


^ V'/VV V 4* A* ^ %, °WM?K* ^ ^ •> 

o^ "° • * * A “VTvf* ^ ^ '©. i * A <* ♦ 

% o^ A^ 0 % * % <*4 0' t »‘ , ' # * ^b *4r o 0 " 9 * 4*> 

&■- -o/ 4^». %/ c %,<* .v^& ^ 


*. Vo« : 


: "fev* 

? '?Wj&; £°*' ’ 

>°,.. • ..,V*'' '->Wv 

4 .4&Sk e . %<❖* * 






® • * 


© 

O 

, +'sa&rS *y V ° 

V. *^vT* cr VD 

4 . % c° .t^:- **L , 

• ^o-» -§m^- "o v* 

’ <^ °-*' •v4^5*« »p r/ u, 

• & % •TfT* .c? %> •Tr;.’ .<p 

v .}*iav*. °-f> -4- 0 ' • , *° 



^ *„**^7r «,f 

A' cp- • / 1 • 

.0^ »’•«» *> 1/ 

p$* 4j4te *w* • 

.‘/V-P* /\*« 

.4> ,.«., V - * ’ * A° 

. , «*SSW. G° C 





: W ; 

‘ 'V •. 


Op: 

s> .‘^kvX a 9 * 


v* <-9 


^ o ♦TttT* \d 'o. , * a ^ 

♦ „ *0^ , 5 ^ (* 0 ^ t* i '- 4, ' f , ^o ^ , 0#M %*' 

!V* x°vv a°^ iPv*. 




' ^' ® $p '■^t, 

^v ^ *V 7 ^•'' A 

v * 0 ^ )»’ • o* ^ <> 

,<• .‘/MV. ^ ^ /'*“* 


^ ^ ^ s ^' ^ ^ ^ 

^ \,*f3p/ -A’'^i. 4^ V %. "'aSK** ° 

<. **TV»‘ .&*■ '»•*'* vv e* *VTvT« &*• \ 

*S\ r t0 *i|fe °° -4^ 0 ^ c 


aK o 0 

v »»v% cv i.»• ®> v" 1 

4 ,‘^^V .\!<OOh.. ^.,4 ‘ 


A«3e. 



siioL*. 















































AN 


3 * 


V 


INSIDE VIEW 


OF 


THE REBELLION, 


AND 


AMERICAN CITIZENS’ TEXT-BOOK. 


BY 


HENRY CONKLINGr, M. D., 


BLOOMINOTON, ILL 


•?t V flit -if 


U i A 


CHICAGO 




TRIBUNE BOOK AND JOB PRINTING ESTABLISHMENT, 51 CLARK STREET. 


1 8 6 4 . 























Head-Quarters Union State Central Committee, 1 
Chicago, July ISth, 1S64. j 

At a meeting of the Executive Committee, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: Re¬ 
solved, That the work by Dr. Henrt Conkling, entitled “ An Inside View of the Rebellion, and Ameri¬ 
can Citizens’ Text-Book,” is recommended for general circulation, and that the Committee will take of 
Dr. Conkling the first ten thousand copies published. 

THOS. J. TURNER, Chairman. 

James P. Root, Secretary. 


,/1v.Ud i .: * < fiCi *. 11 

We concur in the above recommendation. 

« 

Geo. H. Harlow, Gr. Sec’y U. L. A., State of Illinois. 


Springfield, July 21, 1S64. 
S. W. MOULTON, President U. L. A. 





♦ • 



* \ i ) . ‘ 






Entered according to act of Congress, in the year 1S64, by s 
DR. HENRY CONKLING, 

In the Clerk’s Office of the District Court of the United States, for the Northern District 

of Illinois. ■ 





**-*<►• SaY\'*>4- 




% 

PREFACE. 


This work is dedicated to the American people. The writer has been very careful for 
the past four years to collect from various sources such information in regard to the rebel¬ 
lion and its causes, as would be of utility to the American people. But a small part of 
the facts connected with this terrible war are contained in this work, but we trust there 
are enough to satisfy every candid mind of the great importance of being more united in 
maintaining the honor and integrity, of this Government. 

The method of questions and answers has been adopted for the purpose of drawing 
greater attention, interesting the reader, and fastening more indelibly upon the mind the 
facts herein contained. Therefore we hope you will wake up to a just consideration of the 
signs of the times, remembering that “eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.” 

You hold in your hands the destiny of this country ; look well to your ways, and see 
that you do not give your suffrage to that party who will pander to the Slave Oligarchy 
whose object is to sever in twain this once prosperous but now distracted country, making 
slavery the corner-stone thereof. 


/ 




' 

* 


9 

. A') i -i n <{ 

/ ‘f ' 1 

■ * — '■■■ — 1 ■ " -*■ - 

'■ ■ r 1 'T ' -U'r ■ ■' hnhvH *-< '■{ i •;i,; ; 

auoh ,• >{2o> ■ j ■••• :> ■■ m <•’ i-: i ’ ,ii 

; 

. 

■ f US hi Hit \ 'tO . . 

. 

■ 

’• - ' t fit-- , i 

i . • • •• Ot rtow i oi ,!J. ■ l [ V . / ,«i j !. . 

- r , il . . :* : m<{ ; oi ... - - •. 

•> & Jo/uJ-Jilt •.•■ft i o ■ - , > :» •• •. < - j- » . ’ 

-■? 3 -ismoo CW - r fa 













» 










INSIDE VIEW OF THE REBELLION. 


Ques. —What are the views and feelings of the people of the North in regard to the 
rebellion ? 

Ans. —They a$e divided into two classes: First, those who are in favor of prosecuting 
the war and sustaining the Administration. Second, those who are against the Adminis¬ 
tration and the war, and in favor of making peace with the rebels. 

Ques. —Who are included in the first class ? 

Ans. —Republicans and Democrats, or, as they are called, War Democrats. 

Ques. —Who are included in the second class ? 

Ans. —Conservatives, Anti-War Democrats, Rebel Sympathizers and Traitors. 

Ques. —Are not the Conservatives a separate and distinct party, who are working for 
the good of the Union and the subjugation of the rebels? 

Ans. —Not at all; their doctrines and teachings harmonize with the Anti-War Democrats 
and Rebel Sympathizers. 

Ques. —What are the teachings of these parties, and how are they understood ? 

Ans. —Their records are clear, as will be shown for your consideration. 


Record of Republicans and War Demo¬ 
crats. 

Resolution of the Union mass Convention 
of Illinois, held at Springfield, Sept. 3rd, 
1863. 

“ Resolved , That we are in favor of the fur¬ 
ther offensive prosecution of the war , because 
we believe it is the only way to crush out this 
rebellion, and because we do not believe that 
its further offensive prosecution tends to 
anarchy or misrule, but the speedy overthrow 
of the rebellion and the permanent re-estab¬ 
lishment of the government and on an hon¬ 
orable basis.” 

At an immense Union meeting composed 
of Republicans and War Democrats, held in 
Philadelphia, March 11th, 1863, the follow¬ 
ing resolutions were adopted: 

“ Resolved, That no calamity could befall 
the American people so terrible in its results, 
as the breaking up of the foundation of the 
Government of the United States, and under 
a solemn sense of duty to God and our 
country, we therefore pledge to each other, 
our sacred honor to sustain the President and 
its other constituted authorities in their efforts 
to overwhelm and subjugate its enemies by 
force of arms, and all the appliances of war, 
as the only means of restoring its sovereign 
authority under the Constitution, securing 
the blessings of peace, and preserving the 
liberties of the people.” 


Record of Conservatives, Anti-War Demo¬ 
crats, Rebel sympathizers, and Traitors. 

Resolution of the Anti-War State Conven¬ 
tion held at Springfield, Illinois, June 17th, 
1863. 

“ Resolved, That we are opposed to the fur¬ 
ther offensive prosecution of the war, as 
tending to subvert the Constitution and the 
Government, and entail upon this nation, all 
the disastrous consequences of misrule and 
anarchy,” 


At an Anti-War Tory Democratic meeting 
held in Edgar county, Illinois, 4th of July, 
1863, the following resolution was adopted : 

“ Resolved, That we hereby undividedly 
pledge ourselves one to another, that we will 
not render support to the present Administra¬ 
tion in carrying on the abolition crusade 
against the South. 

“ That we will resist to the death, all at¬ 
tempts to draft any of our citizens into the 
army, and that we will permit no arbi¬ 
trary arrests to be made among us by the 
minions of the Adnfinistrati^” 

I* 



6 


“ Resolved, That in this momentous struggle 
in which the nation is now engaged, we have 
a common and undivided interest, with our 
patriotic armies in the field and all who value 
the prdud title of American citizens in main¬ 
taining the honor of its flag and the unity of 
its Government, and we greet all such citi¬ 
zens of every tongue,, kindred and persuasion 
throughout the land, as our friends and 
brethren in a righteous cause, and we earn¬ 
estly invoke their stern rebuke of every trea¬ 
sonable suggestion to abandon the contest and 
their active aid in proclaiming to foreign 
powers and domestic foes, the irrevocable 
will of the American people that the Union 
must and shall be preserved.” 

At a Union meeting held in the “ Cooper 
Institute,” New York, Oct., 1862, at which 
meeting several exiles from the South were 
present and addressed the meeting, the fol¬ 
lowing resolutions were adopted: 

“ Whereas, The present Chief Magistrate 
is using all constitutional means to put down 
this rebellion, restore peace to the country, 
and bring the leaders of this unparalleled 
treason against free institutions to condign 
punishment; therefore 

“ Resolved , That any terms of compromise 
or of peace, short of an unconditional sur¬ 
render of the rebels to the authority of the 
United States, would be degrading to the 
sovereignty, and destructive of the rights 
and liberties of all loyal citizens of the 
South.” 

“ Resolved, That the salvation of the Union 
depends on a vigorous prosecution, of the War, 
until the stars and stripes wave triumphantly 
from the Canadas to the Gulf, and from 
ocean to ocean.” 

Senator Douglass, (War Democrat) said in 
his last legacy to the Democratic party, May 
10th, 1861, “all hope of compromise with 
the cotton States was abandoned, when they 
assumed the position that the separation of 
the Union was complete and final, and that 
they never would consent to a reconstruction 
in any contingency, not even if we would 
furnish them with a blank sheet of paper, and 
permit them to inscribe their oimi terms. 

“ In view of this state of things, there was 
but one path of duty left to patriotic men. 
It ivas not a party question, nor a question in¬ 
volving partizan policy; it was a question of 
Government or No Government, Country or 
No Country ; and hence it became the imperative 
duty of every Union man , every friend of 
constitutional liberty, to rally to the support 
of our common country, its Government 
and flag, as the^jly means of checking the 
progress of the]H|olution, and preserving 
the Union of tl^^Bates. I trust the time will 
never come wherJ^Miall not be willing to make 
any sacrifice of personal feeling and party feel- 


W. W. Eaton, .one of the leading spirits 
of a democratic convention which nomin¬ 
ated Seymour for “ Governor ,” in a closing 
speech said, “ The doings of this convention 
will awaken lively emotions in the South. The 
resolutions we have adopted will cause a 
thrill in the hearts of our Southern Brethren. 
T. II. Seymour is a man whom the brave 
men and lovely women of the South love, 
honor and esteem. The conservative men of 
the North vnll grasp the demon Abolition by 
the throat, strangle it, and invite our brethren 
of the South to unite with us.” 


The “New York News” (Tory) submits 
the following plan in a recent issue: 

“ In leagueing with the War Demoa'acy they 
do not volunteer for a prosecution of the war ; 
their mission in the campaign is to defeat Black 
Republicanism, and on that point they accord 
with the War Democracy. When Black Re¬ 
publicanism shall have vanished before the 
united strength of the Peace and War Demo¬ 
crats, then will come the hour to confront the 
War Demoa'acy and give them battle upon the 
direct issue. It is the duty of the peace* 
party to exert themselves as strenuously as 
if one sentiment animated themselves and 
their coadjutors. A victory over Black Re¬ 
publicanism is the first step towards a tri¬ 
umph of the peace sentiment. We must attempt 
that step, however distastefid may be the com¬ 
panionship of those who lack our sympathy on 
"'the war question. We do not yield our advoca¬ 
cy of peace, but simply hold that issue in 
reserve.” 


Extract of Lord Lyons’ letter to Earl Rus¬ 
sell : 

“Washington, Nov. 17th, 1862. 

Mv Lord : On my arrival at New York, on 
the 8 th instant, I found the conservative lead¬ 
ers exulting in the crowning success achieved 
by the party in that State. 

On the following morning, however, intel¬ 
ligence arrived from Washington which dashed 
the rising hopes of the conservatives. 

It was announced that General McClellan 
had been dismissed from command of the 
army of the Potomac, and ordered to repair 
to his home. 

The General had been regarded as the repre¬ 
sentative of the conservative principle in the 
army. Support of him had been made one 
of the articles of the conservative electoral 
programme. 

Several of the leaders of the Democratic 
party sought interviews with me both before 
and after the arrival of the intelligence of 
General McClellan’s dismissal 


trig and party policy , for the honor and integ¬ 
rity of rny country.” 

The “ Louisville Democrat,” (War) a lead¬ 
ing Democratic paper of Kentucky says: 

“ There can he no true democracy, while 
treason keeps its armies in the field, except 
‘War Democracy.’ The office hunters who 
at a time like this, preach peace, peace , in the 
North, may be Democrats in name, but 
( in reality they are traitors and Tories who 
would be in arms against their Government, 
were they living in the so-called Confeder¬ 
acy.” 


Pledge of the Loyal National League. 

“We the undersigned citizens of the United 
States, hereby associate ourselves under the 
name and title of the Loyal National League. 

“ We pledge ourselves to an uncondi¬ 
tional loyalty to the Government of the 
United States ; to an unwavering support of 
its efforts to suppress the rebellion ; and to 
spare no endeavor to maintain unimpaired 
the National Unity, both ip principle and in 
territorial boundary. The primary object of 
this league is and shall be to bind together 
all loyal men of all trades and professions in 
a common effort to maintain the power, glo¬ 
ry and integrity of the Union.” 


The subject uppermost in their minds 
while they were speaking to me, was natur- 
ally that of foreign mediation between North 
and South. 

Many of them seemed to think that this 
mediation must Come at last, but they ap¬ 
peared to be very much af raid of its coming too 
soon. 

They appeared to regard the present mo¬ 
ment as peculiarly unfavorable lor such an 
offer, and indeed to hold, that it would be es¬ 
sential to the success of any proposal from 
abroad that it shoidd be deferred until the control 
of the executive Government should be in the 
hands of the Conservative party.” 

p 

The following is part of the oath of the 
“Knights of the Golden Circle”: 

The candidate having his hand on the Bi¬ 
ble, is asked, 

“ Do you believe this to be the word of God, 
and do you believe the present war now 
being waged against us to be unconstitu¬ 
tional ?” 

Both being answered in the affirmative, 
the candidate takes the following oath: 

“ I promise and swear that I will do all in 
my power to bring all loyal Democrats into 
this circle of hosts; and I further promise 
and swear, that I will do all in my pow¬ 
er against the present Yankee disunion Ad¬ 
ministration ; so help me God.” 


Ques. —Do not the Anti-War, Conservative Democrats charge this war upon the Abo¬ 
litionists ? 

Ans. —They do. In May, 1862, some of the Democratic members of Congress issued 
an address to the people of the United States, in which may be found the following lan¬ 
guage: “The bitter waters of secession flowed first and are fed still from the uncleau 
fountain of Abolitionism. Armies may break down the power of the Confederate Gov¬ 
ernment of the South, but the work of restoration can only be carried on through politi¬ 
cal organizations. In this great work, we cordially invite the co-operation of all men 
of every party who arc opposed to the fell spirit of Abolitionism.” 

Ques. —Can you give. the definition of an Abolitionist ? 

Ans. —We can; from two authorities which the Anti-War Conservatives cannot 
object to: 


Definition of an Abolitionist, from Chicago 
Times (Tory.) 

“ He who supports the war is against the 
Union, because the war is the most terrible 
engine for the destruction of the Union 
which Beelzebub himself could have invent¬ 
ed; the professed Democrat , therefore , who has 
his senses about him , and is deliberately for the 
war , is not a Democrat in fact , but an Aboli¬ 
tionist of the most radical , violent and destruc¬ 
tive kind.” 


Definition of an Abolitionist, from the 
Richmond Literary Messenger (Secesh.) 

“An Abolitionist is any man who does not 
love slavery for its own sake as a Divine insti¬ 
tution , who does not worship it as the corner 
stone of civil liberty , who does not adore it as 
the only possible social condition on which a 
permanent Republican Government can be cre¬ 
ated , and viho does not in his inmost soul desire 
to see it exteruled and perpetuated over the whole 
earth , as a means of human reformation , sec¬ 
ond in dignity and importance to the Christian 
religion. \Vho does not love African slavery 
with this love is an Abolitionist " 


Ques, —Reader, are you foT prosecuting the war and subduing the re 
Yes, then you are an Abolitionist of the most radical kind ; so says the 
and it is the text-book for the Anti-War, Conservative Tory Democrats. 


Ch 


if you say 
icago Times , 


8 


Ques. —Do you believe that slavery is a Divine institution, and can you adore it as the 
corner stone of civil liberty, and second in dignity and import ance to the Christian relig¬ 
ion ? If you do not thus love slavery, then you are an Abolitionist —so says the Literary 

Messenger. 

Ques, —Which one of these horns will you lay hold upon ? 

Ans. —I will lay hold upon neither; but will contend for the Flag of the Union and 
Freedom. 

t ' t 

Having shown that the people of the North are divided into two classes, and the doc¬ 
trines taught by them, we will now pass on to show— 

1st. That the rebellion was inaugurated under James Buchanan’s administration, 
although it had been in contemplation some time previous. 

2nd. That the people of the South had not been deprived of any of their rights which 
caused them to rebel. 

3rd. Show what were the real designs of the South in rebelling and establishing a 
separate Government. • 

4th. The rebellion as presented under Mr. Lincoln’s administration, and the difficulties 
surrounding him. 

5th. The policy adopted under his administration for suppressing the rebellion. 

6tn. The reason the rebellion has not long since been subdued ; and 

7th. Prove by their own record that the rebels spurn with contempt any propositions 
of compromise coming from the North, save that of a recognition of their independence. 

• 

Ques —How long before the expiration of James Buchanan’s term as President of the 
United States had the rebellion been in progress ? 

Ans. —About three months. 

Ques. —What progress had the South made in that time ? 

Ans. —The Stites of South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana and 
Florida had seceded, and all their forts, arsenals, dock yards and custom houses had been 
seized and held in open hostility to the Government, except Forts Pickens, Taylor, Jeffer¬ 
son and Sumter. 

Ques. —Did James Buchanan, as President of the United States, use the means within 
his power to suppress the rebellion ? 

Ans. —He did not; for his views and feelings were with the South. 

Ques. — Have we any evidence of this ? 

Ans. —The 16th of March, 1850, he wrote a letter to Jefferson Davis, in which he used 
the following language: “I first went to Congress in December, 1821, and throughout 
my whole public career have been uniform in maintaining the just constitutional rights of 
the South. I shall be assailed as long as I live for having gone further in support of the 
South than Southern Senators and Representatives. I am committed to the Missouri Compro¬ 
mise, and that Compromise shall stand; under these circumstances, it would be madness 
in me to take higher ground for the South than they have taken for themselves; this would 
be to out-Herod Herod, and to be more Southern than the South.” 

Ques. —What other evidence have we ? 

Ans. —The special Message of James Buchanan that was sent to Congress on 9th Jan¬ 
uary, 1861, The most important feature of the document is in regard to the rebellion, in 
which he says: u l'he, right and duty to use the military and naval forces against those who 
illegally assail the Government , are clear and indisputable .” But he considers the present 
state of things revolutionary, and beyond Executive control , and throws the whole responsi¬ 
bility of action upon«Congress. He alleges as a reason for not sending reinforcements to 
Major Anderson, “ that such an action would have furnished a pretext, if not the provo¬ 
cation, for aggression on the part of South Carolina.” 

Ques. —How long before this Message was sent to Congress had South Carolina passed 
a secession ordinance ? 

Ans. —About three weeks. 

Ques. —Who was Secretary of War under Buchanan ? 

Ans. —John B. Floyd. 

Ques. —How many fire arms did he send South under one order ? 

Ans. —One hundred and fifteen thousand. 

Ques. —What evidence have wo of this ? 

Ans. —The Richmond Examiner, atone time the mouthpiece of Floyd, says: “The 
facts we are a (At to state are official and indisputable. Under a single order of theHate 
Secretary of John B. Floyd, made during the last year, there was one hundred and 
fifteen thousaiflPlmproved inuskt ts and rifles transferred from the Springfield Armory and 
Watervelet Arsenal to different arsenals at the South; what numbers were supplied by 


9 


other and minor orders, and what numbers of improved arms had before the great order 
been deposited in the South, cannot now be ascertained.” 

Ques —What other evidence is there ? 

—The testimony of Gen Scott, who said in an official report, made to President 
Lincoln, March 30, 1861, “ that in view of the meditated rebellion, Floyd had ordered one 
hundred and fifteen thousand muskets and rifles from Northern depositories to Southern 
arsenals.” 

Ques. —How was John B. Floyd rewarded for his treachery ? 

A us .—By being appointed Brigadier General in the rebel army. 

Qaes. —Had the South premeditated a rebellion and a separate Government? 

Am .—The doctrine of secession was advocated as early as 1790. A letter was written 
April 6, 1790, by Robert B. Lee, grandfather of the present commander-in-chief'of the 
rebel army, in which the writer makes use of the following language: ‘ l, The Southern 
States are too weak at present to stand by themselves, but when we shall attain our natu¬ 
ral degree of population, I flatter myself that we shall have the power to do ourselves 
justice with dissolving the bond that binds us together.” 

The Richmond Examiner says in regard to the rebellion: “ It has taken forty years to 

bring it about.” 

Andrew Jackson wrote a letter to Andrew J. Crawford, May 1, 1833, in these words: 
“The tariff* was only the pretext with the South, while disunion and a Southern Confede¬ 
racy the real object. The next pretext will be the negro or slavery question?' 

Qaes. —Have we any other evidence ? 

Ans. —J. M. Mason, United States Senator from Virginia, wrote a letter to Jefferson 
Davis, September 30, 1856, in which he says: “I have a letter from Wise, of the 27th, 
full of spirit. He says the Governors of North Carolina, South Carolina and Louisiana 
have already agreed to meet at Raleigh, and others will. Tfris you will keep secret. He 
says further, that he had officially requested you to exchange with Virginia, on fair terms 
of difference, percussion for flint muskets. Virginia, probably, has more arms than the 
other Southern States, and would divide in case of need. In a letter yesterday to a com¬ 
mittee in South Carolina, 2^” I gave it as my judgment in case of Fremont’s election, the 
South should not pause, but proceed at once to immediate, absolute and eternal separation. 
So I am a candidate for the first halter. _ .Wise says, accounts from Philadelphia are 
cheering for Old Buchanan in Pennsylvania. I hope they be not delusive.” 

Ques. —What position did Wise hold at this time ? 

Ans. —He was Governor of Virginia. 

Ques .—What position did Jefferson Davis hold when this letter was sent to him by 
Mason ? 

Ans. —He was Secretary of War under Franklin Pierce. 

Ques .—Were Buchanan and Fremont candidates for President at this time ? 

Ans —They were. 

Take notice, reader, that Mason, Davis and Wise were plotting with the Governors of 
North Carolina, South Carolina and Louisiana, to overthrow the Government in 1856, in 
case Fremont was elected. 

Ques. —Had the people of the South been deprived of any of their rights, which caused 
them to rebel and establish a separate Government ? 

Ans —They had no just cause of complaint. 

Ques. —What evidence of this have we ? 

Ans .—There is abundant testimony, to which we call your attention. 

Thomas H. Hicks, Governor of Maryland, and a slaveholder, published an address in 
January, 1861, to the citizens of that State, in which he used the following language: “ I 
firmly believe that a division of the Government will inevitably produce a civil war. We 
are told by the leading spirits of the South Carolina Convention, Jt^pthat neither the 
election of Mr. Lincoln, nor the non-exectuion of the fugitive slave law, nor both com¬ 
bined, constitute their grievances. They declare that the real cause of their discontent 
dates back as far as 1833.” 

Ex-Governor Stewart introduced in 1861, a resolution in the Missouri Convention, say¬ 
ing : “ That no overt act had been committed by the Federal Government to justify either 

nullification, secession or revolution.” 

Andrew Johnson, of Tennessee, delivered an address to the Third Minnesota Regiment, 
near Nashville, in February, 1862, in which he said: “He knew the leaders of tnis rebel¬ 
lion well, both personally and politically, and he declared it was the firm determination of 
the rebel leaders to overthrow popular Government, and establish a despotism instead of 
our present liberal institutions, JQi f ”an'd that the people of the South would not submit to 
a President who had sprung from the common people as Abe Lincoln hadA 

Parson Brownlow, of Tennessee, said in a speech in 1862: “ The SMth had no cause to 

1* 


10 


complain . With half the States and Territories and half the population of the North, they 
have had thirteen out of nineteen Presidents, five of whom occupied the Presidential chair 
forty vears.” 

When the Crittenden propositions were before Congress in December, 1860, Senator 
Iverson, of Georgia, held the following language: “Sir, the Southern States that a-e 
moving in this matter, are not doing it without due consideration. I^*We don’t suppose 
there will be any overt acts on the part of Mr. Lincoln. We do not propose to wait for 
them ; we intend to go out.” 

Pryor, of Virginia, telegraphed from Washington to Richmond : “ We can get the 

Crittenden Compromise, but we don't want it." 

Stephen A. Douglas said in his Springfield speech, April 27, 1861: “For the first 
time since the adoption of the Federal Constitution a wide-spread conspiracy exists to de¬ 
stroy tha besttrovernment the* sun of Heaven ever shed its ravs upon. The simple ques¬ 
tion presented to us is, whether we shall wait for the enemy to carry out his boasts of 
making war upon our soil. ask you to reflect, and then point out any one act that 

has been done and any one duty that has been omitted to be done, of which any one of 
these disunionists can justly complain.” 

Hwing shown that the South had no just cause of complaint, the question arises, what 
were the real designs of the South in establishing a separate Government ? 

Ans. —Two objects were contemplated in establishing a Southern Confederacy— 

1st.* An Oligarchy or Monarchy ; and 

2nd. The perpetuation of slavery. 

Ques. —Have we positive evidence of this ? 

Ans. —We have ; as their own speeches and writings will testify. A letter was sent to 
the French Court, November, 1862, signed by Jefferson Davis and seventy-three of the 
leading men of the South, urging of the Emperor a speedy recognition of the South, and 
offering the following inducements to Napoleon: 1st. That it is the intention of the lead¬ 
ers of the South, (which intention is to be kept secret until the war is over,) as soon as 
their independence was declared, to establish a Nobility in the South before the army was 
disbanded. That the poor whites or non slave owners, who would help them fight and 
conquer their independence, so soon as a Nobility is established, and they are left free to 
act, will emigrate North and leave only the Noble and his slave. Constituting the firmest 
Nobility, because the Peasant will be the properly of the Noble , while the line of demarcation 
between them will be that of color and race; that their ability so to establish a Nobility 
cannot be doubtful, when it is well known that the leaders of the South had forced this 
war and established the present Confederacy, 

Ques. —Has not the above declaration been published for party effect without any just 
foundation ? 

A.ns. —Not at all. We will offer other good evidence to substantiate the above. The 
following extract is taken from the Southern “ Literary Messenger,” published in Rich¬ 
mond, Virginia. “ That benign institution of Slavery which is now the pride and glory of the 
South , to ascribe to the conception of Divinity the great element of power in the Con¬ 
federacy, will prove in preventing too he'avy an influx from foreign shores of that class of 
population devoted to menial pursuits ; let us seek at once to eradicate every vestige of 
JRadical Democracy, every feature tending to make us a popular Government ; let us 
Hearn from history that popular principles are but poor guarantees to liberty. * We have no 
special objection to royalty when restrained by constitutional barriers ; certainly the 

■ condition of a subject of the Czar of Russia, the most absolute monarchies, is preferable to 
that of a democratic government. <^l?l No foreigner who comes amongst us after the 
struggle is over should ever enjoy the elective franchise.” 

In-the “Richmond Whig,” of June, 1862, is found the following language : “ The experi¬ 
ence of the war is an attestation of the truth long since discovered by impartial ob¬ 
servers, that the master race of this continent is found in the Southern States. 

Of a better stock originally, they have tuled in affairs of State by force of the stronger will 
and larger wisdom. This natural dominancy of the Southern people had much to do 

in bringing on this war ; with us the contest is for hereditary right, for the old repute of 
better blood.” 

A,t a meeting, held in Baltimore, April, 1868, the following among other resolutions were, 
after grave discussion, passed by the ablest men and largest slaveholders of the State : 
“Resolved, that the origin and progress of the rebellion leave no room to doubt that the 
institution of slavery has become an instrument in thp hands of traitors to build an 
oligarchy antfran aristocracy on the ruins of Republican liberty.” 

In the “ Richnrond Examiner,” may be found the following language : “ We have got to 


11 


bating everything with the prefix “free,” free farm?, free labor, free children ; j^§Tbut 
the worst of all these abominations is free schools ; they belong to the same brood of 
damnable isms whose mother is sin and whose daddy is the devil.” 

The “ MuSiogee Herald,” published in Alabama, says, in regard to free society, “ We 
sicken at the name ; what is it but a conglomeration of greasy mechanics, filthy operatives, 
small-fisted farmers, and moon-struck theorists; all the Northern States are devoid of well- 
bred gentlemen ; the prevailing class one meets with is that of mechanics struggling to be 
genteel, and small farmers, who do their own drudgery, J^gT" and yet are hardly fit to asso¬ 
ciate with k Southern gentleman’s body servant.” 

The ‘‘Atlanta Intelligencer,” of the 20th January, 1863, says: We are fighting this 

war for Southern Independence and for a government of Southern States, recognising Af¬ 
rican Slavery ./SgTI as an institution ordained by God, beneficial to mankind, a necessity in 
our social and political relations as States and in our intercourse with all other nations or 
States', hence the admission of any free State into our Union is not only repugnant to us, 
but it will be only a continuance of that evil which has brought on the war, and which 
we are how fighting to get rid of. 

We will now close under this head with one more quotation from the “Louisville Cour¬ 
ier,” once the organ of the Breckinridge Democracy of Kentucky. “ As our Norman kins¬ 
men in England, always a minority, have ruled their Saxon countrymen in political vassal- 
age up to the present day, so have we, the Slave Oligarchs, governed the Yan¬ 
kees till within twelve months ; we framed the constitution, for seventy years moulded 
the policy of the Government, and placed our own men Jgif~or Northern men with South¬ 
ern principles , in power. On the 6th November, I860, the Puritans emancipated them¬ 
selves, and are now in violent insurrection against their former owners. A few more Bull 
Run thrashings will bring them under the yoke as docile as our Ethiopian chattels.” 

We will now consider the Rebellion as presented under Mr. Lincoln’s Administration,” 
the difficulties with which he has been surrounded, and the policy adopted for subduing 
the rebels. 

Q>oe &.—Was Mr. Lincoln elected by the popular vote ? 

Ans —We will give the vote of Mr. Lincoln and Mr. Douglas, they receiving the highest 


number cast. 

Mr. Lincoln’s vote was...... .... .... 1,857,610 

Mr. Douglas “ “ ........ 1,365,976 


Lincoln over Douglas.... 491,634 


OF the electoral votes cast, Mr. Lincoln’s majority over Douglas, Breckinridge and Bell, 
was 57. 

Ques ,—What was the condition of Buchanan’s Cabinet and both houses of Congress at 
the time of Mr. Lincoln’s election ? 

Ans .—The New York World of June, 1862, will inform you. It says: “In the dark days 
of 1860, we h id the imbecile and false-hearted Buchanan at the head of the Government; 
the incompetent and perfidious Cobb was ruining the public credit. The thief Floyd 
was transferring the public arms to the southern States, that thorough-paced rascal Thomp¬ 
son was the active coadjutor of the before mentioned worthies. The Senate was presided 
over by the traitor Bi eckinridge, and both houses of Congress swarmed with secessionists.” 

Qucs .—What were the views and feelings of Mr. Lincoln in regard to the difficulties 
with which he was surrounded ? 

Ans .—When Mr. Lincoln left Springfield for Washington, in Feb., 1861, he bade adieu 
to his frieuds and neighbors in the following language: “My friends, no one not in my 
situation can appreciate my feelings of sadness at this parting. To this place and the kind¬ 
ness of this people I owe everything. Here I have lived a quarter of a century, and have 
passed from a young to an old man ; here my children were born, and one lies buried. I 
now leave, not knowing when or whether ever I may return, with a task before me greater 
than that which lested upon the shoulders of Washington. Without the aid of that Divine 
Being who controls mine and all our destinies, I caunot succeed ; with that assistance, I 
cannot fail. Trusting in him who can go with me and remain with you, and be every where 
for good, let us confidently hope that all will yet be well.” 

Mr. Lincoln, while on his way to Washington, stopped at Columbus, Ohio, and in reply to 
Lieut. Gov. Kirk, the presiding officer of the Senate, spoke as follows, to both branches of 
the Legislature who were in joint session : “ It is true, as has been said by the President of 
the Senate, that very grave responsibilities rest upon me, to which th# votes of the 
American people have called me. I am deeply sensible of that weighty responsibility that 
has fallen upon me, and so feeling I cannot but turn and look for that support without 
which it will be impossible for me to perform that great task. I turn then and look to 






12 


the American People, and to that God who has never forsaken them. Allusion has been 
made to the interest felt in the policy of the new administration. In the varying and re¬ 
peatedly shifting scenes of the present, without a precedent which could enable us to judge 
by the past, it has seemed fitting that before speaking upon the difficulties of the coun¬ 
try, |W° I should have gained a view of the whole field, to be sure after all, being at lib¬ 
erty to modify and change the course of policy as future events make a change necessary.” 

Ques. —What was the condition of the Army and Navy ? 

Ans. —Ex-President Buchanan said, in a letter published in the “National Intelligencer,” 
Nov., 1862, “That the whole, of the American army at the close of his Administration, 
consisted of only sixteen thousand men, and as late'as the 4th of March, 1861, the 
time of Mr. Lincoln’s inauguration, a force of not more than six hundred and fifty-three 
men rank and file could be mustered in Washington, and to make up this number, even the 
sappers and miners were brought from West Point.” 

Hon. Gideon Welles, Secretary of the Navy, in his report of Dec. 1st, 1862, makes the 
following statement: “ When I entered upon the discharge of my public duties as the 
head of this Department, in March, 1861, there were but forty-two vessels in commission, 
and as stated in my last report but seventy-six vessels then attached to the Navy. Most 
of those in commission were abroad, and the seven hundred seamen in the pay of Govern¬ 
ment. There were on the 10th of March, 1861, but two thousand and seven men in all 
the ports and receiving ships on the Atlantic coast to man our ships and protect the na¬ 
vy yards and depots, or to aid in suppressing the rising insurrection. Neither the ex¬ 
piring Administration nor Congress which had been in session until the 4th of March, 
1861, had taken measures to increase or strengthen our naval power, notwithstanding 
the lowering aspect of public affairs, so that when a few weeks after the inauguration I 
desired troops for the protection of the public property at Norfolk and Annapolis, or 
sailors to man and remove the vessels, neither soldiers nor sailors could be procured, 
nor were the few ships at our yard in a condition to be put into immediate service.” 

Ques. —What was the condition of the rebel army and the number of arms at their dis¬ 
posal at this time ? 

Ans. —As early as February, 1861, Governor Pickens of South Carolina, stated in a mes¬ 
sage to the State legislature, “ That all possible exertions have been made to put the sea 
coast in a good state of defense; the guns required for the different ports are being sent 
forward with all possible dispatch, and arms have been put in the hands of cavalry compa¬ 
nies formed in the Parishes bordering on the sea coast.” 

Wigfall, in a letter to a friend in Washington, April, 1861, says, in great confidence, that 
the Confederate army will capture Washington before the middle of June. He says, “they 
have one hundred thousand well armed troops , and in less than two weeks will be on their way 
to Washington, and expect to winter in Philadelphia.” 

The Memphis Avalanche, of May, 1861, says, “ Twenty thousand soldiers are ready 
to march from Tennessee and Arkansas, to Columbus, Kentucky, so hurry up your battery 
at Columbus, gallant men of Western Kentucky, who we know are sound to a man in the 
cause of Southern rights; Tennessee and Arkansas will be with you in the fight; just say 
how many troops you want , and you shall have them .” 

The Memphis Appeal, of May, 1861, makes the following statement in regard to arms in 
the South: “ The erroneous opinion seems prevalent in some quarters that the South is 
totally destitute of arms. An estimate of the amount on hand, however, will shoio our state 
of preparation for resistance. The following seizures have been made since the Southern 
movement: 


Baton Rouge, . 

Alabama Arsenal, .. 

Elizabeth, N. C.. 

Fayettville, N. C.. 


Charleston, . 

Harper’s Ferry, ........ 

Norfolk,. 

Other places,. 





290,000 

The State arms previously purchased by 

the States: 


Alabama,. 

Virginia, .. 

Louisiana, . 

Ge.orgia,. 

.120,000 

South Carolina,. 

Mississippi, . 

Florida, . 


# 



417,000 

290,000 




707,000 




















13 


“ The grand total amounting to seven hundred and seven thousand stand of arms , besides 
200,000 revolvers which are on hand at other points. We have not included in the above, 
the arms owned by the States of Tennessee, Arkansas, Texas, Kentucky, Maryland and 
Virginia.” 

Ques .—Is it possible that such great preparations were made under Buchanan’s Admin¬ 
istration, and the country kept in ignorance of the fact ? 

A ns .—Such is the case. A few leaders of the rebellion at Washington and in the 
South, were secretly laying out the work, while the masses were ignorant of their plans. 

Qucs .—Can we not, under all these circumstances, see the propriety of the remarks of 
Mr. Lincoln to the citizens of Buffalo, when on his way to Washington, and before his 
inauguration ? “ Your worthy Mayor has thought fit to express the hope that I may be 

able to relieve the country from existing difficulties. I am sure 1 bring a true heart to the 
work. When we speak of threatened difficulties, it is natural that something should be said 
by myself in regard to particular measures; upon more mature reflection, however, others 
will agree with me that these difficulties are without precedent, and have never been acted 
upon by any individual situated as I am. It is meet that I should wait and see the 

developments, and get all the light possible, so that when I do speak authoritatively, I 
may be as near right as possible.” 

Ques .—What was one of the first important acts of Mr. Lincoln after his inauguration ? 

Ans .—He notified the Governor of South Carolina, that an attempt would be made to 
send provisions to Major Anderson, and the brave soldiers who were in fort Sumter, and 
if there was no resistance offered, then there would be no attempt to throw in men and 
arms, or ammunition, without further notice, or in case of an attack upon the fort, and 
furthermore, Mr. Lincoln said , “ you can have no conflict without you yourselves are the aggres¬ 
sors .” 

Ques .—Were those brave men permitted to receive provisions? 

Ans .—They were not; as soon as it was telegraphed to the rebel Government that ships 
with provisions had sailed from New York, they determined that supplies should not be 
thrown into Fort Sumter. At 20 minutes past 4 o’clock, Friday morning, April 13, 1861, 
the bombardment commenced against Fort Sumter, from the rebel batteries of Fort Moul¬ 
trie, Fort Johnson, Cumming’s Point and Stevens’ Battery. Fort Sumter was several 
times set on fire by the red hot shot from Fort Moultrie, the officers’ quarters had ignited, 
and the flames raged fiercely. The little garrison worked with energy in repelling an 
enemy without and subduing a fiercer one within ; by noon all the buildings were on fire, 
and to add to the frigh ful scene, there were several explosions of magazines, a raft was 
hastily constructed and laden with men who passed up buckets of water to their comrades 
in the fort in a vain attempt to extinguish the flames. During this time the Federal flag was 
displayed at half mast as a signal of distress, still the iron hail poured out remorselessly 
and incessantly from the confederate batteries; yet the most devoted loyalty to their flag, 
animated that handful of brave hearts, thus hopelessly battling against such overwhelming 
odds. After strugging against such fearful odds for forty hours, Major Anderson felt the 
necessity of raising a flag of truce.” 

Ques. —How soon afier the fall of Sumter did Mr. Lincoln call for seventy-five thou¬ 
sand troops? 

Ans .—The next day, April 16th, 1861, and on the 18th, the first troops arrived in 
Washington. 

Ques .—Was there not in Washington at this time, many rebel spies and traitors? 

Ans. —There was, not only at Washington, but throughout the North. 

Ques .-— Was it not necessary, under these circumstances, to suspend the privilege of the 
writ of habeas corpus ? • 

Ans. —The revolution going on in the South, and there being many in the North assist¬ 
ing the rebels, rendered it necessary that it should be done. 

Ques .— What did Mr. Lincoln say, upon this subject in his message to Congress, 4th 
July, 1861 ? 

Ans .—“ Soon after the first call for militia, it was considered a duty to authorize the 
commanding general in proper cases, according to his discretion, to suspend the privilege 
of the habeas corpus, or in other words to arrest and detain without resort to ordinary 
proce-s and forms of law, such individuals as he might deem dangerous to the public safety. 
Now it is insisted that Congress, and not the executive, is invested with this power, but the 
Constitutnn itself is silent as to which or who is to usurp the power, and as the provision 
was plainly made for a dangerous emergency, it cannot be believed that the framers of the 
instrument intended that in every case the danger should run its course until Congress 
should be called together, the very assembling of which might be prevented, as was intended 
in this case by the rebellion .” 

Ques —Has not Mr. Lincoln been charged with committing an act not warranted by the 
Constitution or any former precedent? 


14 


Ans. —The enemies of Mr. Lincoln so CQndemn him, but the day is not far distant when 
he will be sustained by an American people. 

Ques. —Have we other instances upon record bearing upon this subject ? 

Ans.— There are ; to which we call your attention : 

In 1777 twenty gentlemen of high respectability in the city of Philadelphia, were 
arrested by order of the Supreme Council of Pennsylvania, banished to a town in Virginia, 
and there detained. These arrests were made with the knowledge and approbation of Gen. 
Washington. A writ of habeas corpus was issued, but it was disregarded by the officers 
in charge of them. September 16, 1777, the Legislature passed a bill indemnifying the 
Executive Council and suspending the writ of habeas corpus. 

In 1806, Gen Wilkinson caused the arrest of certain traitors in New Orleans, impli¬ 
cated in Burr’s conspiracy. Judge Workman of that city issued a writ of habeas corpus 
in the ease, but it was disregarded. President Jefferson used the following language in re¬ 
gard to the matter: “A strict observance of the written law is doubtless one of the 
high duties of a good citizen, p^~.mt it is not the highest; the laws of necessity, of self- 
preservation, of saving our country when in danger, ARE ALL OF HIGHER OBLI¬ 
GATION.” 

In the celebrated speech of Stephen A. Douglas, of January 10, 1844, iu regard to the 
suspension of the writ of habeas corpus, may be found the following language; ‘‘If his 
(Gen. Jackson’s) acts were necessary to the defense of the country. THAT NECESSITY 
WAS ABOVE ALL LAW, and the man that dared .do that, deserved the protection and 
plaudits of his country. He did not envy the feelings of that man who could get up and 
talk calmly and coolly under such circumstances about rules of court and formalities of 
proceedings. (E^^The man that would do this would fiddle while the Capital was burn¬ 
ing. Talk about formalities ; why there was but one formality to be observed, and that 
was the formalitv of directing the cannon and destroying the enemy regardless of means. 
WHETHER IT BE BY THE SEIZURE OF PERSONS, if the necessity of the case re¬ 
quire it, to defend the country, let him not be told that it was unconstitutional to use the 
necessary means. If martial law was necessary for the salvation of the country, nnrtial 
law was legal for that purpose. If it was necessary for a judge for the preservation of 
order to punish for a contempt, he thought it was necessary for a General to exercise con¬ 
trol over his cannon, to impress traitors, and to arrest spies, and to intercept communica¬ 
tion with the enemy—if this WAS NECESSARY, THIS WAS LEGAL” 

Ques. —Did Congress sustain Mr. Lincoln in suspending the writ of habeas corpus ? 

Ans. —The Senate and House of Representatives, by a statute which was approved on 
the 3rd day of March, 186,3, “ authorized the President to suspend the privilege of the writ 
of habeas corpus whenever in his judgment the public safety may require it, in any State 
throughout the United States.” 

Ques. —What other important acts have been passed under Mr. Lincoln’s adminis¬ 
tration ? 

Ans. —The Conscription Act, the Emancipation Proclamation, Confiscation Act, and 
organization of Negro regiments. 

Ques. —When was the Confiscation Act passed ? 

Ans. —Congress passed the act the 17th July, 1862. f , 

Ques. —Were not the rebels given sixty days (after due notice by the President) to re¬ 
turn to their allegiance to the United States, before their property would be confiscated ? 

Ans. —That was the order of Congress; and in accordance therewith the President 
gave due and timely warning, on the 25th of the same month. 

Ques. —Who, then, is to blame if their property was taken from them ?• 

Ans —No others but themselves, and the unanimous verdict of the people in the North 
was, that it was just and right. 

The New York World (Conservative) said: “ Fpr ourselves we approved the Confisca¬ 
tion Act, and see nothing which should change our opinion.” 

Ques. —How has the Emancipation Proclamation been received by the people in the 
loyal States ? 

A»s. —All true and loyal men have indorsed it, while the Anti-War, Tory, Conserva¬ 
tive Democracy have denounced it, although some of these approved it at first. 

Ques. —When was the Proclamation issued ? 

Ans .—On the 22nd (fay of September, 1862. 

Ques. —What length of time did it run;before taking effect? 

Am.— About one hundred days, or until the 1st of January, 1863. 

Ques. —Had not the rebels sufficient time and opportunity to accept of the proffered 
terms ? 

Am. —They certainly had, but they were determined not to accept of any overtures of 
mercy, as Wigfall and Pryor made their boasts in Washington, just before the inaugura¬ 
tion of the rebellion, that if the entire North would put their signatures to a blank 


15 


piece of paper, allowing the South to fill it up over their names and dictate the terms on 
which they would stay in the Union, they would not accept it, because they wanted to go 
out and have an independent Government of their own.” 

Ques. —Had Mr. Lincoln the power to enforce such a law ? 

—The President being Commander-in-chief of the army and navy in time of actual 
armed rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States, did so, (as a 
fit and necessary war measure for suppressing said rebellion, at the same time giving the * 
rebels ample time to reflect and return to their allegiance to the United States. 

Ques. —Did the Proclamation extend to all the States wherein slavery existed ? 

.dm.—It only extended to those States that were in actual and armed rebellion and con¬ 
tinued so until the 1st of January, 186 5. 

Ques. —What evidence of approval of the Proclamation have we ? and the conse¬ 
quences of secession ? 

Ans. —Abundant testimony can be produced. We call your attention to a few in¬ 
stances : 

The New York World used the following language: “Emancipation was a risk the 
South consented to incur when they joined the rebellion. We have no commiseration to 
waste upon them, and they are weaklings and cravens if they whine over the foreseen con¬ 
sequences of their own acts.” 

The Kent News, of May, 1862, published in Maryland, says: “But for secession we 
should yet have been peaceful- and prosperous. To it we trace all the evils we are now 
laboring uuder, and on the heads of thetsecessipnists of Maryland equally with those of the 
South Carolina leaders, must rest all the responsibility of high taxes, depreciation of prop¬ 
erty and abolition of slavery .” 

Gov. Hicks, of Maryland, in a speech said: “ If slavery stands in the way, let it go. 

I am a slaveholder, but my principles are, my country first, last, and all the time l ” 

In a speech against secession in the South Carolina Legislature, three years ago, Mr. 
Boyce of that State uttered these prophetic words: “ I object in as strong terms as I can, 
to the secession of South Carolina. Such is the intensity of my convictions upon the 
subject, that if secession should take place—of which I have no idea, for I Cannot believe ■ 
in the existence of such a stupendous madness—I SHALL CONSIDER THE INSTITU¬ 
TION OF SLAVERY AS DOOMED, aqd that the great God in our blindness has made us 
the instrument of its destruction ! ” 

The Cambridge Democrat , a leading Maryland journal, says: “What he (the President) 
or his party will next do or sanction, we know not. Certain it is, his emancipation acts are 
meeting with response in Maryland.” 

Hon. Joseph Holt, of Kentucky, says: “No one can doubt the power of Mr. Lincoln 
to issue a proclamation of emancipation.” 

The following is an extract from a letter written by a resident of Georgia in July, 1863: 

The Emancipation Proclamation of Mr. Lincoln struck Jeff. Davis the hardest blow 
he has received.” 

At a large meeting held at the Cooper Institute, New York City, October* 1862, the 
following resolution was passed unanimously: 

“ Resolved, That we regard the Confiscation Act and Emancipation Proclamation as emi¬ 
nently just and constitutional measures, which should be strictly enforced.” ; 

Ques. —Did Mr. Lincoln adopt this policy hastily and without much study ? 

Ans —Mr. Lincoln said to the Rev. W. W. Patton and Rev. John Dempster, who pre¬ 
sented a memorial to him-upon that subject, from a large meeting that was held in Chicago, 
composed of men from the bench, from the counter, from the work-shop, from the pulpit, 
and men who had been warm supporters of Mr. Douglas in his contests: “ The subject of 
emancipation occupied his mind by day and by night, and was brought renewedly to his 
attention by the course of events and by the arguments addressed to him. On one side or 
the other he wanted to be satisfied, before issuing a proclamation of Freedonj, that it 
would not be a brutum fidmen ; that it would readily accomplish its end in strengthening 
the case of the Union and giving liberty to the slave. He was anxious to know the will 
of Providence in the matter ; if he could find out what it was, he felt sure, unless he was 
grossly self-deceived, that be would do it.” , 

At a meeting of the Governors of the loyal States, held at Altoona, Pa., September 24, 
1862, the following is a part of an address to the President of the United States: 

“We hail with heartfelt gratitude and encouraged hope, the Proclamation of the Presi¬ 
dent, issued on the 22nd of September, declaring emancipated from bondage all persons 


16 




held to service or labor as slaves, in the rebel 
1st day of January.” (Signed) 

A. G. Curtin, Governor of Pennsylv’oia. 


J. A. Andrew, 
Rich. Yates, 

I. Washburn, 

J. E. Salomon, 
S. J. Kirkwood, 


Mass. 
Illinois. 
Maine. 
Wiscousin. 
Iowa. 


States, whose rebellion shall last until the 

0 P. Morton, Governor of Indiana, 

Wm. Sprague, “ R’d Island. 

F. H. Pikrpont, “ W. Virginia. 

David Tod, “ Ohio. 

U. S. Berry, “ Vermont. 

Austin Blair, “ Michigan. 


Ques .—What is understood by the Conscription Act? 

Ans —A bill that was passed by Congress February 26th, 1863, for drafting soldiers 


into the army. 

Ques .—Had not this policy been urged upon the Government ? 

Ans .—It had, from many parts of the country. Many of the Democratic papers urged 
the draft. The New York World, of July, 1862, used the following language: “The call 
for volunteers under the present circumstances, will not accomplish the end ; there is no 
other way but to resort to drafting, and the sooner this is done the better. Let the Gov¬ 
ernment not hesitate a single week. We must reinforce, and there is no way to reinforce 
with sufficient promptitude except by drafting.” 

In August the same paper said : “ Many men dread a resort to drafting, but a general 

draft, one which should raise half a million instead of three hundred thousand, would be a 
great benefit, as it is the only means which can insure the putting down of the rebellion. 
This result may, by a fortunate train of circumstances, be attained by the numbers that can 
be se ured by volunteering, yet it is all uncertain. The only safe reliance is in the sup¬ 
ply which only drafting can yield.” 

The 4 Illinois State Register,” of August, 1862, said : “ We are in fivor of drafting, be¬ 
cause this is a terrible war on our hands, and soldiers will not come voluntarily ; thousands 
and ten of thousands will volunteer rather than be drafted, but there are many more tens 
of thousands who will have to be forced in.” 


The “ Albany Atlas and Argus,” spoke repeatedly to the same purpose, and on the 11th 
July, 1862, urged Congress to pass a conscription act before adjourning. On the 31st of 
July, it used the following language: “No war of proportions like the present was ever 
conducted by volunteering. Throughout all Europe, conscription is the rule.” On the 5th 
day of August, the same paper said : “ The demand upon the state has been greater than 
was ever dreamed of by the wildest imagination. It has been met with wonderful alacrity 
and facility; it is now doubled, and the exigency of the occasion demands a draft.” 

The “ Dubuque Herald,” of July, 1862, said: “ The fairest way to raise troops is by draft¬ 
ing, for it is the onlv way that those who hive been the principal cause of the existing 
war, can be made to bear their share of its sacrifices and hardships.” 

The “ Boston Daily Advertiser*,” says: “In spite of the occasional attemps of the ultra 
opposition to represent the conscription bill as a despotic, and cruel' measure, the major¬ 
ity of our people will have no regret at its passage, except that it was not passed a year 
sooner.” 

Ques. —Was the organization of Negro regiments a wise policy ? 

Am. —It certainly was. Many Negroes were anxious to enlist into the Union army. 
One hundred thousand have already been mustered into the service ; they have proved 
themselves good soldiers, and every one enlisted saves that many white soldiers. 

Ques. —Were they not admitted into the rebel service a long time before mustered into 
the Union army ? 

Ans. —On the 2nd of Feb., 1861, Fort Palmetto on Cole Island in the harbor of South 
Carolina was completed, and the soldiers then celebrated the event by raising the Palmet¬ 
to flag. Some fifty Negroes who had assisted in digging ditches, the Mercury says, then 
assembled on the ramparts around the flag staff and gave utterance to the following senti¬ 
ment: “ We are de fust dat come to dis fort, we work on ’em til’e finish, tree chairs for 
Palmetto flag, tree chairs for Capen Poff, and tree more for Sous Carolina.” 

The “ Memphis Appeal,” and “Memphis Avalanche,” of May 9th, 10th, and 11th, 1861, 
had the following notice: “Attention, volunteers! Resolved, by the committee of safety, 
that C. Deloach, D. R. Cook and W. B. Greenlaw be authorized to organize a company com¬ 
prised of free men of color of the City of Memphis, for the service of our common de¬ 
fense. All who have not enrolled their names will call at the office of Win. B. Greenlaw & 
Co.” 

The “ Mobile Register,” says : “ That the Negro.is no longer an object of small talk in 
the South. The people in the South have a place for them, and that is in the army.” 

Ques. —Were black men used as soldiers in the Revolutionary war, and the war of 1812? 

Ans. —Mr. Livermore, who has collected much evidence on this point, says : “At the 
battle of Bunker Hill, 17th of June, 1775, Negro soldiers stood side by side and fought 


17 


bravely with their white brethren ; and Peter Salem, a negro soldier, once a plave, fired the 
shot which killed Major Pitcairn of the British Marines, who led the assault.” 

In 1776, Gen. Green reports to Washington, that 8<)0 Neg oes were then collected on 
Staten Island to be formed into a regiment. On the 23rd of October, 1777, a Hessian of¬ 
ficer who was with Burgoyne at the time of his surrender, wrote iu his journal, of oyir 
army: “ The Negro can take the field instead of his master, and therefore no regiment is 

to be seen in which there are not Negroes in abundance, and among them are able bodied, 
strong and brave soldiers.” 

When Col. Green was surprised, and murdered near Points Bridge, New York, on the 14th 
May, 1781, hi3 colored soldiers heroically defended him till they were cut to pieces; and 
the enemy reached him over the dead bodies of his faithful Negroes. 

Mr. Madison thought it advisable to enlist blacks; so also did Gen. Washington, who 
wrote a letter to that;.effect in December, 1775. 

Early in 1778, it was proposed’by Gen. Barnum to Washington, that the two Rhode 
Island battalions in camp at Valley Forge should be united, and that the officers of one, 
Col. Green, Lieut. Col. Olney, and Major Ward, with their subalterns, be sent to Rhode Is¬ 
land to enlist a battalion of Negroes, for the continental service ; this plan was approved, 
and the officers were sent home for that purpose. 

In Virginia an act was passed, emancipating all slaves who had served their term in 
the army faithfully. The act acknowledged that such persons having contributed towards 
the establishment of American liberty, and independence, should enjoy the blessings of 
freedom, as a reward for their toils and labors. 

The following address of Gen. Jackson was read to the black soldiers in New Orleans, 
Dec. 18th, 181,4: “ Soldiers from the shores of Mobi'e, I collected you to arms, I invited 

you to share in the perils,; and to divide the glory of your white countrymen ; I expected 
much from you, for I was not uninformed of those qualities which must render you so for¬ 
midable to an invading foe. I knew that you could endure hunger and thirst, and all the 
hardships of war ; I knew that you loved the land of your nativity, and that like ourselves 
you had to defend all that is most dear to man ; but you surpass my hopes ; I have found 
in you, united to those qualities, that noble enthusiasm which impels to great deeds.” 

Ques. —Why is it, with our large army and navy, the vast resources of the country, the 
great preparations that have been made, and are still making for the success of the Fed¬ 
eral arms and the salvation of our country, that the rebellion has not long since been sub¬ 
dued, and peace and quiet again restored to our once happy, but now distracted country ? 

Ans. —Two reasons will be given to the above question : 1st, a negative, or what has 
not been the reason ; 2nd, a positive answer, or show by facts wherein the difficulty ex¬ 
ists, and who are to blame. 

1st, negatively. The fault cannot be imputed to Mr. Lincoln, as he said before his in¬ 
auguration, “ he brought an honest heart to the work,” which statement has been ex¬ 
emplified throughout his whole course. He said to the South, Ig£F“ “ you yourselves can¬ 
not have war without your being the aggressors.” 

In April, 1861, he calls upon those who were in open rebellion against the Govern¬ 
ment, to lay down their arms, and return to their respective callings ; and thereby pre¬ 
vent all the horrors of a civil war. 

In July, 1862, he issued another proclamation, calling upon those who were in open re¬ 
bellion to the Government, to return to their allegiance to the United States, giving them 
sixty days to consider the matter, and in case of refusal their property would be con¬ 
fiscated. 

In Sept., 1862, he issued another proclamation to the rebels, to return to their allegi¬ 
ance to the Government, giving them one hundred days to meditate upon the subject, and 
in case of refusal at the end of that time, their slaves should be emancipated. 

In Dec., 1863, he issued another proclamation, holding out the olive branch to the rebels, 
and saying to them, that a full pardon would be granted to all those below the rank of 
Colonel, if they would lay down their arms, and swear to be good and loyal subjects of the 
Government. Well may Mr. Lincoln say, what more can I do ? “I have called and ye 
have refused, I have stretched out my hand and ye have not regarded it.” 

Neither was it because Mr. Lincoln was not the right man in the right place. 

The “ New York World,” of March, 1862, in speaking of Mr. Lincoln’s character, says : 
“We have had many Presidents who could reach decisions more rapidly, but none, not 
even Jackson, whose mind was more self-determined. Take the most important acts of his 
administration, and see how perfectly they bear the impress of his unass'sted hand. It is 
in this unborrowed strength of character, combined with perfect honesty, .JjglJ that 
the country has the best of guarantee for the preservation of our institutions.” 

The “ London Spectator,” one of the most respectable journals of Europe, says, “ Mr. 
Lincoln has been tested as few Presidents have ever been tested, and though he may not 
always have been fully to the level of a great emergency, he has seldom failed to display a 


18 


noble impartiality, a great firmness of purpose, and a sagacious, if somewhat utilitarian 
judgment. We believe a juster man never held the reins of Government.” 

The Staats Zeitung says, in regard to Mr. Lincoln, “ Always in sympathy with the in¬ 
stinct of the American masses, from whose ranks he came, the President has advanced from 
position to position, slowly indeed, so that the laggard foot, and the heart full of foreboding, 
could follow him but surely and steadily ; and he has in no instance taken a step backward : 
to the convictions that have been forced upon him by the logic of events, and his own not 
rapid, but clear and sharp comprehension, he has clung with unwavering fidelity ; and what 
he perceives to be right, that he does without timidity, though perhaps with a certain mod¬ 
eration which has its origin in the goodaess of his nature. So the masses not incorrectly 
judge of him, and hence it follows that spite of the enormous sacrifices which he has 
hitherto called for, and is still expecting from the American people, and spite of the end¬ 
less difficulties of his situation, he is still , after an administration of thirty-three months, the 
most popular man in the nation .” 

Neither has the want of our success been'bwing to a lack of courage on the part of our 
armies. The land is filled with mourning for those who have fallen at the battles of Big 
Bethel, Rich Mountain, Balls Bluff, Fort Doneison, Shiloh, Columbus, Island No. 10, Vicks¬ 
burg, Pea Ridge, Port Hudson, Fredericksburg, Gettysburg, Stone River, Chickamauga 
and many other places. 

We will now offer three principal reasons why the rebellion has not long since been sub¬ 
dued : 

1st, The real strength of the South has been under-estimated. 

2nd, The hopes of Foreign Intervention have encouraged the rebels to hold on; and 

3rd, The aid and encouragement the rebels have received from the Anti-War, Tory, 
conservative Democrats, have been productive of more evil than all other causes combined. 

We will refer to the first two reasons briefly, but upon the last we will show by good 
and sufficient testimony which shall be from themselves, and the South shall bear testi¬ 
mony also, and all loyal Americans shall be the judges and decide if the charges have not 
been fully sustained. 

Ques. —How has the real strength of the South been under-estimated ? 

Ans. —By not including the blacks, as every one used by them is considered equal to 
one white man. 

Ques. —Has the South made this statement ? 

Ans. —The Richmond Whig enumerates the Southern strength of whites between the 
ages of fifteen and fifty, to be two millions; this force can be kept in the field as long as 
the North may assail us, and will not interfere with our agricultural population; our slaves 
can be safely trusted to the management of the Uoys under eighteen years, and the old 
men, and abundant crops be thus secured while our fighting men are in the field. Not so with 
the North ; whenever she puts anything like her military strength in the field, she weakens 
her power to feed her people; and though her white population in 1860, was 19,000,000, 
against 8,700,000 whites in the Smith, and though she ought, therefore, to be able to send 
out two soldiers where we can send one, yet we question much if she can send out her one 
million as readily as the South can.” 

Ques .—Have the South made strong efforts for Foreign Intervention ? 

Ans. —They have, as the following testimony will show: 

In May, 1861, Lord Russell reports to Lord Lyons, the substance of a conversation he 
held with Messrs. Yancy, Rost and Mann, delegates from the Confederate States. 

Foreign Office, May 11th, 1861. 

My Lord: “ On Saturday last, I received at my house, Mr. Yancy, Mr. Mann and Judge 
Rost, the three gentlemen deputed by the Southern Confederacy, to obtain their recognition 
as an Independent State ; one of these gentlemen, speaking for the others, dilated on the 
causes which had induced the Southern States to secede from the Northern ; the principal 
of these causes, he said, was not slavery, but the very high prices which for the sake of pro¬ 
tection to the Northern manufactures, the South were obliged to pay for the manufactured 
goods which they required. I said I could hold no official communication with the dele¬ 
gates of the Southern States; that however, when the question of recognition came to be 
formally discussed, there were two points upon which inquiry must be made: First, whether 
the body seeking recognition could maintain its position as an independent State: Secondly, 
In what manner it was proposed to maintain relations with Foreign States. After speak¬ 
ing at some length on the first of these points, and alluding to the secession of Virginia, 
and other intelligence favorable to the cause, concluded by stating, that they should remain 
in London for the present, in the hope that the recognition of the Southern Confederacy 
Would not be long delayed.” 


19 


These Commissioners could not get Lord Russell “to see it.” And after waiting and 
watching, they learn that other Commissioners will be sent from the Rebel Government. 

Accordingly two noted Torys, Mason and Slidell, were sent November, 1861, (in a British 
vessel, “Trent,”) as Commissioners to treat with England for the establishment of a South¬ 
ern Confederacy ; they secured the co-operation of the London Times ; also the services of 
leading men in England and France, were obtained to advocate the Southern cause. Ves¬ 
sels were fitted out in England for the Southern Confederacy; sensation articles were pub¬ 
lished in London journals in order to strengthen the South, and after two years of painful 
anxiety both North and South, a; to the course England would take, Mason dispels all doubts, 
by writing a doleful letter to'Earl Russell, dated London, September 21st, 1863. 

“ My Lord: In a dispatch from the Secretary of State of the Confederate States of Ame¬ 
rica, dated 4th of August last, and now just received, I am instructed to consider the mis¬ 
sion which brought me to England, as at an end, and I am directed to withdraw at once 
from this country. The reasons for terminating this mission are set forth in an extract 
from the dispatch which I have the honor to communicate herewith. ‘ The President be¬ 
lieves tha^ the Government of her Majesty has determined to decline the overtures made 
through you for establishing by treaty, friendly relations between the two governments, 
and entertains no intention of receiving you as the accredited Minister of this government 
near the British Court. Under these circumst tnces, your continued residence in London 
is neither conducive to the interests, nor consistent with the dignity of this governmeut, 
and the President therefore requests that you consider your mission at an end, and that 
you withdraw with your Secretary, from London.’ Having made known to your lordship, 
on my arrival here, the character and purposes of the mission intrusted to me by my Gov¬ 
ernment, I have deemed it due to courtesy, thus to make known to the government of Her 
Majesty, its termination, and that 1 shall, as directed, at once withdraw from England. 

I have the honor to be, your Lordship’s very obedient servant, 

J. M. MASON.” 

Ques. —How is it, that the course the Anti-War Conservative Democrats have taken 
has been productive of more evil than all other causes combined? 

Ans. —By their opposition to the Government, and giving aid and comfort to the rebels. 

Ques. —What is their record, and how has it been received by the rebels ? 


Record op the Anti-War Conservative 
Democrats. 

At a meeting of the Democratic Cent¬ 
ral Committee, of the City of Chicago, 
May 25th, 1863. The following resolu¬ 
tions were unanimously adopted : 

Whereas, The Hon. C. L. Vallandigham, 
a citizen of the State of Ohio, has been ar¬ 
rested without the intervention of jury, and 
condemned to banishment, for exercising 
his constitutional right of free speech ; and, 

Whereas, the President, Abiaham Lincoln, 
by his approval thereof, has clearly indicated 
that it is the intention of this Administra¬ 
tion to subvert the liberties of the people, 
and erect a military despotism upon the 
ruins of the Republic; therefore be it 

Resolved , That the Democratic Central 
Committee of the State of Illinois are re¬ 
quested to call a convention of the Democ¬ 
racy and other citizens of this State, (or of 
the North-Western States,) who are deter¬ 
mined to maintain all their constitutional 
rights, to meet at some early day, to vindi¬ 
cate the rights of free speech, and consult as 
to the measures necessary for their common 
safety. 

Resolved, That in the name of ten thou¬ 
sand voters of Chicago, we tender to Gover¬ 
nor isevmoui ot tne State or New I or*, :>ur 


Record op the Rebels in the South. 

The Chattanooga Rebel , in an editorial of 
May 29th, 1863, says, in regard to Mr. Val¬ 
landigham, “How natural it is that we all 
feel kindly towards Mr. Vallandigham; we 
do not doubt the course he will adopt, we 
really consider his prospects to be Governor 
of Ohio very fair; we wish them realized be¬ 
cause he is a peace mai^ an able and honest 
one. He -is our style of man , and as such we 
do not wish him consigned to the obscurity 
and misfortunes of an exile, when he is pow¬ 
erful for good. While he is with us, let us 
show him how deeply we can sympathize 
with a foeman worthy of our steel, a gener¬ 
ous enemy. 

“ We cidmire McClellan , and we admire Bud 
also ; we admire Mr.Vallandigham more than 
all because he was against the war at the 
start, and has kept his faith ever since.” 

On the 29th, the same paper says, “His, 
Vallandigham’s, road which leads up the 
steep ascent of the future, is direct and gas- 
lighted all the way ; it leads first out of some 
Confederate port to Nassau ; thence to Cana¬ 
da, and finally to the Gubernatorial chair of 
Ohio. Let Mr. Vallandigham’s return be as 
speedy as possible ; let the absence of a sin¬ 
gle month find him issuing an address to the 


heartfelt thanks for his noble and patriotic 
letter to the late free speech meeting of the 
city of Albany. 

The Chicago Times, (the organ for the 
Anti-War, Tory, Conservative Democrats,) in 
speaking of Vallandigham, in July, 1868, 
Said: 

“ Mr. Vallandigham should not wait any 
permission of the President td return; he 
should return of his own will and pleasure. 
He is said to have left the Confederacy on 
his Way to some ohe of the British Colonial 
ports, in a blockade runner, his only means 
of escape. He shodld, as his right, boldly 
in the light of day, come back to Ohio. If 
the Federal military authorities attempt to 
interfere with him, let the Democracy of Ohio 
take care of him. Whenever he shall enter 
the United States, we cannot doubt that he 
will have an escort of thousands; and when 
he shall enter Ohio, he shall be received as a 
man in the country has never been received 
before.” 

The “Chicago Times,” of April, 1882, 
says, “ It is worse than folly to talk of co¬ 
ercing the Southern States into submission 
to the Federal Government. It would be 
impossible to accomplish such a result, and 
even if it were not, such a policy would be 
the most disastrous in every respect, that 
could possibly be pursued. 

“ We can tell the Republican party every¬ 
where, one thing, that if the refusal to re¬ 
peal the personal liberty laws shall be per¬ 
sisted in; and if there shall be no change in 
the present seeming purpose to yield to no 
accommodation of the National difficulties, 
and if troops shall be raised in the North to 
march against the people of the South, a 
fire in the rear will be opened upon such 
troops which will either stop their march 
altogether, or wonderfully accelerate it.” 

When the blood-thirsty Irish thugs were 
howling, burning, plundering and murdering 
in New York City, July, 1868, Governor 
Seymour addressed them in the following 
language: “ My noble friend #, I have sent to 
Washington to have the draft stopped ; I will 
have the constitutionality of the act tested 
by our State Courts, and if they pronounce 
against the law, I’ll support their decision 
by the whole power of the State.” 

At a meeting of Peace Democrats held in 
Chicago, December 3, 1863, the following 
resolution was adopted: 

Resolved , That the power of the Federal 
Government to make war upon a sovereign 
State of this Union, is wholly inconsistent 
with, and contrary to the intentions of its 
authors. That whatever be the theory of 
constitutional power, war, as a means of 


people iof Ohio, from Lower Canada pro¬ 
claiming these things to them : 

“ ‘ I, C. L. Vallandigham, a. loyal Citizen of 
the Union, persecuted, exiled, mobbed and 
coerced by cowardly tyrants, and by bayo¬ 
nets, but not dead nor dumb, issue these 
words, and declare myself a candidate for 
Governor of Ohio.”* 

The Georgia “ Constitutionalist,” before 
the battle of Chickamauga., urged Bragg to 
strike Rosecrans a crushing blow, giving the 
following reasons therefor: 

“We were never more fully convinced 
than now, of the essential importance Of 
thick, fast and heavy blows from the Con¬ 
federate armies, in order to give vitality, sys¬ 
tem and organization to the Peace men. 
Mr. Vallandigham himself, as we have heard, 
most emphatically declared, that the success 
of Southern arms alone could give strength 
and consistency to the Peace movement.” 

(From the Cincinnati Commercial.) 

When Morgan’s band was going through 
Ohio, they stopped at a hickory pole at New 
Baltimore, in Hamilton county, and hurrahed 
for Vallandigham; and they said, if Abe 
Lincoln did not let him come home, they 
would bring him back to Ohio. 

The traitor, M. F. Maury, wrote a letter to 
the London Times, August 17,1863, in which 
he says, “Vallandigham waits and 

watches over the border, pledged, if elected 
Governor of Ohio, to array it against Lin¬ 
coln and the war, and go for peace.” 
“ And other agents have been called in play; 
what are they? let us inquire. They are 
divisions in the camp of the enemy, dissen¬ 
sions among the people of the North. There 
is already a peace party there; all the 
embarrassment with which that party Can 
surround Mr. Lincoln, and all the difficulties 
that it can throw in the way of the war party 
in the North, operate directly as so much aid 
and comfort to the South.” 

The editor of the Vicksburg Whig, of 
October, 1863, said, |W° “All the energies 
of the Confederacy Will be bent to maintain 
the war until the expiration of Mr. Lincoln’s 
presidential term ; the idea has become 
general, that by that time, a man will be 
elected, who will represent the views of the 
peace Democrats. It is well understood that 
every day adds to the number of their 
friends, and that already Northern secession¬ 
ists, conservatives as they are called here , are in 
a numerical majority. Every argument used 
in the North in reference to the constitu¬ 
tional rights of men is hailed with delight. 

The Chicago Times, which is univer 
sally regarded as their great advocate in the 
North-West, is almost entirely reprinted in 


21 


restoration of the Union, is a delusion in¬ 
volving the waste of human life, national 
bankruptcy, and the downfall of the Re¬ 
public. 

“ That we are in favor of peace, an uncon¬ 
ditional peace. n 

The Chicago Times, of December 12th, 
1863, says, “If we have less respect for war 
Democrats than for Peace Democrats, it is 
because the former are designedly auxiliary 
to the abolition party, and in its immediate 
service, whereas the latter serve abolition¬ 
ism only as they divide and distract the De¬ 
mocratic party. Good Democrats will have 
no connection with movements outside of 
the regular Democratic organization, what¬ 
ever the professed objects of such move¬ 
ments may be. If the country can be saved 
only as it shall be saved by the Democratic 
party , as we solemnly believe, the Democra¬ 
tic party will be potent to that end only as 
its unity and integrity shall be preserved. 
It will not permit segments to make its poli¬ 
cies, or to lead or control it in any manner.” 

Major Key, who was on General Halleck’s 
staff, by a recommendation from General 
McClellan, said to an officer after the battle 
of “ Antietam,” “ the immediate de¬ 
struction of the Rebel army was not the pro¬ 
gramme. It would be better, he said, to let 
the war linger on indecisively, and with ad¬ 
vantage to both sides, until the end of Mr. 
Lincoln’s administration, when it could be 
settled on a compromise which would save 
slavery.” 

When the Democratic convention was in 
session in Springfield, Illinois, Wednesday, 
June 15, 1864, a telegram wa3 received from 
Ohio, saying that Vallandigham had return¬ 
ed from Canada, and was then addressing a 
Democratic convention in Hamilton, which was 
received with uproarious cheering; one of the 
members of the convention moved that the 
convention resolve to sustain C. L. Vallan¬ 
digham in his rights, and stand by the State 
of Ohio in so doing, which was carried, and 
the President was directed to telegraph the re¬ 
solution to Ohio. 

Mr. Green, chairman of that convention, 
on taking his seat, returned thanks in the 
usual style; waxing elequent over Lincoln des- 
potism, accumulated debt, and disregard of the 
Government principles instituted by the 
Fathers of the Revolution. He counselled 
them to work together in harmony. He re¬ 
ferred in triumphant tones to the Fre¬ 
mont movement as a hopeful sign to them; 
one which would enable them once more to 
ride into power and save the country. 


the Southern papers; gFf all the conven¬ 
tion proceedings, proceedings of the peace 
Democrats, are immediately copied and 
spread broadcast, and received with the wild¬ 
est joy.” 

The Richmond Whig, says, “So far from 
wishing for the arrest of such men as Sey¬ 
mour and Hunt, we applaud every effort of 
theirs which tends to embarrass Lincoln, 
Chase and Sumner, and weaken their power ; 
we would like to see them gel possession of the 
Government; take the very worst view of 
such a contingency, and we would lose 
nothing.” 

The Point Coupe Echo, {La.,) a rebel 
sheet, says, “ The great speech of Dick Mer¬ 
rick, of Illinois, will have its effect every¬ 
where, and will sow the seeds of dissension 
in the ranks of the Federal troops, if any¬ 
thing will. The whole West will soon break 
forth. We see the smoke, and fire is not far 
distant. lEW* God speed the good work and 
let the whole puritanical North be enveloped 
in ruin and desolation.” 

The Richmond Examiner , of Feb. 12th, 
1863, says, “Amongst the foreign relations 
of the Confederacy, none is at this moment 
more interesting than our relations with the 
States of Indiana and Illinois. It represents 
to us every day, and we know it to be a fact 
that the people of those States are heartily 
tired of the war as waged by the abolition¬ 
ists. HEW" Democrats in those States bring in 
strings of resolutions denouncing Lincoln’s 
government and proclamation. This is all 
very well and highly encouraging to us, . <^1 
but it is also weil for us to understand once 
for all, that the whole affair means simply, 
ffi^"that they, the Democrats, ought to con¬ 
duct and have the profits of the war for the 
Union; that a democratic finance minister 
ought to have the striking off of “ green 
backs;” democratic contractors ought to 
supply the Army ai\d Navy; democratic 
Generals ought to lead ; democratic printers 
ought to print, and democratic thieves ought 
to steal.” 


Ques .—Have the South desired a compromise with the North, and a return to the 
Union ? 

Am .—They have not, as their record will show all the way through. 


22 


Senator Iverson, of Georgia, said, before Mr. Lincoln’s inauguration: “ That the 

South intends to go out of the Union.” 

Pryor, of Virginia, said: “We can get the Crittenden Compromise, but we don’t 
want it.” 

Wigfall said: “If the North would furnish them a piece of white paper to dictate 
their own terms on which they would stay in the Union, they would not accept it, as they 
were determined to have a government of their own.” 

Reader, you will notice the above tfas said before Mr. Lincoln’s inauguration. 

The Richmond Whig, of 1861, says: “This war must go on. The South must fight 
until the North sues for peace. We must dictate the terms of peace. The first article 
of which should be an acknowledgment of the right of secession; the next article to be 
that she pay the utmost farthing of the expense of this war, and the third that she pay for 
the destruction of all property, and the fourth, that she impeach and remove from office 
Abe Lincoln, and hang him for treason and other crimes.” 

Jeff. Davis, in his Message to Congress, in April, 1861, says : “ Our cause is just and 

holy. We seek no conquest, no aggrandizement, no concession from the Free States ; all 
we ask is to be let alone.” 

The Richmond Enquirer, of 1862, says: “The only terms which the Confederate 
States can accept, will be the immediate recognition of the present Confederate States, 
and the permission to the other States to elect their own destiny and to decide whether 
their future shall be with the Confederate States or with the United States.” 

The Augusta Constitutionalist, of 1863, says: “The Northern politicians and people 
cannot, or will not, open their eyes to the great fact that a reconstruction of the Union is 
impossible ; all their hopes of peace and their peace propositions, are based on reconstruc¬ 
tion. jE^f°This singular fallacy or mental delusion, ought to be completely removed by 
this time. We have determined to gain our independence, and we cannot with honor and 
profit to ourselves listen to any proposition other than a complete and unconditional ac¬ 
knowledgment of that independence.” 

The Richmond Dispatch, of January 10th, 1863, says: “If the whole Yankee race 
should fall down in the dust to morrow, and pray us to be their masters, WE WOULD 
SPURN THEM EVEN AS SLAVES ! We are fighting for SEPARATION, and we will 
have it, IF IT COSTS THE LIFE OF EVERY MAN IN THE CONFEDERATE 
STATES!” * 

The Richmond Enquirer, of tDmuary, 1863, says: “ On no terms whatever will the 

South consent to a political association with the North. There is no concession which 
they can grant or human imagination can frame, which could render the idea aught but 
intolerable to the Southern mind. jlW*When the North wants peace she can obtain it by 
recognizing the independence of the Southern States. Her proper mode to secure this result so 
desiraUe to her , would be at once to withdraw her armies from Southern soil, and send her 
commissioners to this capital. NOT EVEN TO BRING ABOUT AN HONORABLE 
PEACE CAN THE SOUTH MAKE THE SLIGHTEST ADVANCE TO THE NORTH ! ” 

Vice-President Stephens, of the Confederate Government, stopped at Charlotte, North 
Carolina, July 17th, 1863, and was serenaded by the citizens. In a speech to them he 
said : “ As for reconstruction, such a thing was impossible ; such an idea must not be tole¬ 

rated for an instant. Reconstruction would not end the war, but would produce a more 
horrible war than that in which we are now engaged. The only terms on which we can 
obtain permanent peace, is final and complete separation from the North. Rather than to 
submit to anything short of that, let us all resolve to die like men worthy of freedom.” 

And now, reader, have we not shown— 

1st. That there are, iu fact, but two parties in the North ? 

2nd. That the South had no ju§t cause to rebel ? 

3rd. What were the real designs of the South in rebelling ? 

4th. The rebellion as presented under Mr. Lincoln’s administration ? 

5th. The policy adopted for suppressing the rebellion ? 

6th. The reason the rebellion has not long since been subdued ? 

7th. That the rebels spurn with contempt any propositions of compromise, save that 
of a recognition of their independence ? 

But you ask, is there not another party in the North, of which John C. Fremont is the 
acknowledged leader ? 

We answer, there is. But we think we can show that J. C. Fremont has fallen from that 
estate wherein he once stood, and like a Judas he has betrayed his trust, and has become 
identified with the Anti-War, Conservative Democratic party, and his name will be regis¬ 
tered low down with the enemies of this government. 

Ques. —What evidence have we that such is the case ? 


23 


Ans. —From his letter of acceptance for the Presidency to the so-called Radical party 
who nominated him on the 3Ut day of Mav, 1864, in Cleveland, Ohio. 

Ques .—Wherein do the doctrines as set forth in that letter harmonize with the Anti- 
War party ? ;n ■ 

Ans .—That you may understand, we will place side by side their teachings: 


Record op J. C. Fremont. 

Here are his words. Compare them with 
the Anti-War Democrats. 

“ Had Mr. Lincoln remained faithful to 
the principles he was elected to defend, no 
schism could have been created, and no^con- 
test could have been possible. ([fW’To day 
we have in the country the abuses of mili¬ 
tary dictation—an administration marked at 
home by disregard of constimtional rights, 
by its violation of personal liberty and the 
liberty of the press; and as a crowning 
shame, by its abandonment of the right of 
asylum, dear to all free nations abroad. 

“ Against this disastrous condition of af¬ 
fairs, the Cleveland Convention was a pro¬ 
test. Tlu principles which form the basis 
of its platform have my unqualified and cor¬ 
dial approbaion. 

If' Mr. Lincoln be re-nominated, as I 
believe it would be fatal to the country to 
indorse a policy and renew a power wipch 
has cost us the lives of thousands of men 
and needlessly put the country on the road 
to bankruptcy, there will remain no alterna¬ 
tive but to organize against him every ele¬ 
ment of opposition, with the view to prevent 
the misfortune of his re-election. In this 
contingency, I accept the nomination at 
Cleveland, and as a preliminary step* have 
resigned my commission in the army. 


The Other Side. 

TfJUfcra itor M. F. Maury, now in England, 
wrote a letter to the London Times , August 
17th, 1863, in which he says: “Other 
Vgmts have to be called into play. What 
are they, let us inquire ? 2^*They are di¬ 
visions in the camp of the enemy, dissensions 
among the people of the North. There is al¬ 
ready a Peace party there. All the embar¬ 
rassments with which that party can sur¬ 
round Mr. Lincoln, and all the difficulties 
that it can throw in the way of the War 
party in the North, operate directly as so much 
aid and comfort to the South ! ” 

The following are some of the charges 
preferred against Mr. Lincoln by the Anti- 
War Democrats in the Illinois Legislature, 
in January, 1863 : 

“He’has suppressed the liberty of the 
press and free speech. 

“ Hq has squandered the National wealth, 
and made us a bankrupt people. 

“ He has degraded the Union army, by 
receiving Negroes into the service of the 
United States.” 

Mr. Vallandigham said, in his speech to 
the members of the Democratic Convention 
in Hamilton, Ohio, June loth, 1864: 

“There is,indeed,a conspiracy very powerful, 
very ancient, and I trust that before long I 
may add, strongly consolidated also upon 
sound principles, and destined yet to be tri¬ 
umphant ; a conspiracy known as the Dem¬ 
ocratic party, the present object of which is 
the overthrow of the Administration in No¬ 
vember next. The emphatic letter of J. C. 
FREMONT gives renewed hope that i t last 
the reign of arbitrary power is about to be 
brought to an end in the United States.” 

The Democrats of New Hampshire met in 
convention at Concord, in January, 1864, 
and among other resolutions passed the fol¬ 
lowing : 

“ Efoolved, That we are opposed to the war, 
and opposed to the policy of the Adminis¬ 
tration, as being unwise, impolitic, and un¬ 
worthy the support of a Christian people.” 


We will now close this work by referring to a portion of Stephen A. Douglas’ speech, 
delivered in Springfield, April 25th, 1861: 

“ We are told because a certain party has carried a Presidential election, therefore the 
South choose to consider their liberties insecure. I had supposed it was a fundamental 
principle of American institutions, that the will of the majority, constitutionally expressed, 
should govern. If a defeat at the ballot-box is to justify rebellion, the future history of 
the United States may be read in the past history of Mexico. The first duty of every 
American citizen is to render obedience to the National Constitution and Laws. Most of 


24 


you know I am a very good fighter in times of partizan strife, 1 hope to show you all that 1 
'am an equally qood patriot in the time of my country's danger. It is now your IMPERATIVE 
DUTY TO THROW PARTY .AND PARTY PLATFORMS TO THE WINDS , for¬ 
get that you ever differed. Give me a country where my children can live in peace, and then, 
w r e can have a theatre if we desire, for partisan controversy. Allow me to say to my old 
friends, you will be false and unworthy of your principles if you allow political defeat to con¬ 
vert yon into traitors to your National land. THE SHORTEST WAY NOW TO PEACE 
CONSISTS IN THE MOST STUPENDOUS AND UNANIMOUS PREPARATIONS 
FOR WAR!" r ' 

• ¥ 

And now we ask you, American citizens, in view of all these facts, what will you do ? 
“Are you willing to swap horses while ci'ossing the strkam? " Are you willing to risk a new 
commander and crew on board the ship when in sight of port ? Are you willing to 
bend the neck and come under the yoke of your Southern masters , as they call themselves ; 
will you bend the knee and pay homage to them? We ask you in the name of everything 
that is dear to American citizens, what will you do ? “If the Lord be God, serve him ; if 
Baal, serve him.” If you are Freemen, worship at the shrine of Freedom; if Slaves, 
worship at the altar of Slavery. But you ask, what hope have we ; have we not many 
discouragements, a large debt and constantly increasing, besides suffering great losses in 
our armies ? To all.of which we answer, Yes; but we ask you to open your eyes and see 
who is chargeable for much of this. We have shown jou that the Anti-War, Conservative 
party must bear the responsibility; they must me'et the charge before the bar of the 
American people when the history of this rebellion is* written in its true light. The blood 
of thousands of our brave and noble soldiers who now lie buried away from friends 
on Southern soil, cries for redress—from the “ fre-in-the-rear party." If our armies had 
not have had this party to contend against, we to-day'could have the proud satisfaction of 
knowing that the great Ship of State has out-riddep- the angry waves, and come safe into 
port, and those who sought to dash her to pieces^ upon the rocks have been severely pun¬ 
ished for their temerity, and brought'td know tha't tire Union of the States is inseparable, 
now and forever. ' 

i 


Jr . 

i' - 


tv 



t 


# 



) Jt. . > 






’ 


,U 












































% <v ♦? 5 rr«‘ ,o 4 

°o *, \ ,o 4 *o 







*° *° ^ 4 ?-* 

Qp J 4* t* 41 J V 

-.wBff ® v> °i\ o* 

AjSsv j«? Vv »yj^vv ^ 

-#> 0^ ^o jV « 

r C *-<£’r(Y?7^ O ^ 

» ^ *■ 9 «4A «SA ' 

^0 y K ; 


4* v .•-•♦ 

<1^ • 

•>*„ ,-v ,vw. - 

• ■ A o 





V. ^ 

: f ^ - A\M t *W « 

V *** -. • ttb /«I 1 WB\ A a ^|P '\£» % 0 

* 



* 4 0 

■ . V ^ 

-a.^ O *V 

y .... °* ••••• a° 

■ vi 0 ► * 




r, W 
..* ^'V ° 

♦ ^-OA <£■ • 

O . s ’ .0 O '0 - » 

^ cr ^o 

' "a, . 0 * jB/tffcvv ° 





'J* *1 


o V 




* *5 ^ '4 

0 'o » t ^ A ** 

* 0 , *4> ^ ••* .... 

• *b^ • 


* * o 



^ v^?y A* V\ 

’■• /iife'- ■%. ./ .* 

° C^ ^V/V o T^/'telvOvy «» \ V>^V j ’ 

»* ^ V °?w>a % • 

"O # i * «\ 

>0 V ' « • c " *-f **b ^<Ja 6 o « o . ^ 

;■ ;. ^ 0 1 

© <0 -A 



^ o. 

A’ « 



‘O' %. 

- ^ ^ % e 41 * 

<$> ^ A*& » 

° ^^jev » * \n C$ + 

* ^ r Kpc> « 

* *o ' 

1 * -^P .-r 





o 'W' v 

*»•«" a 0 ^ »rr,*’ # l 

^ *c> r»^ V. .\“ 

V . ^ jj-* 'y % 8 ^ / 

r < ^■s 5 ’ ♦ jOMOA ^ A 

w. va v • 

>% “Vjss.w* aV -s* ", A o 

^ a 4 ^ *¥mt' ,«r ^ % 

111. t a \ ... < t*. '••’ .lO* O a -O. , 





4=4 































